home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: btree.is.brooktree.com!usenet
- From: sasha@brooktree.com (Alex Bakaev)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
- Subject: Re: Visual C++
- Date: Tue, 09 Jan 1996 21:32:47 GMT
- Organization: Brooktree Corporation
- Message-ID: <4cumsj$o9t@btree.brooktree.com>
- References: <4cka82$rmm@news.tamu.edu> <4cs7le$963@ornews.intel.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: komissar.is.brooktree.com
-
- thurman_b_miller@ccm2.hf.intel.com (Thurman Miller) wrote:
-
- >skp2813@cs.tamu.edu (Sriram K Parameswar) wrote:
-
- [deleted]
- >If you are planning on
- >writing applications for Windows or NT, I'd go with C++, strictly for
- >the MFC library (Microsoft Foundation Class) which is the same source
- >that Windows 95 & NT were written in.
-
- Utter rubbish. Show me at least one Win95 or Win NT component written
- in MFC. Stop this mindless promotion of MFC, please. At least in the
- C++ newsgroup.
-
- >Thurman
-
- Alex
-
-
-
-
-
-